Page 22 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

CAUSALITY RELATIONS IN ECONOMIC PROCESSES: METHODOLOGY INTERPRETATION

other words, the antonym for the closeness is not “open”; it is rather

incompleteness or diversification. The opening of the system is not
denied, however its impossibility borders are identified. Thus the system

can open or be opened to the external environment. If it is internally
opened, it cannot exist as stand-alone system.

Therefore, relation between manageable causalities and internal

closeness of the system or transfer of external interference into the close
one has solely subjective concept. It cannot be explained by either

necessity or sufficiency. It is impossible until situation turn into the
desired one. As a result we came to the following conclusions: first, if

there is no result, it is impossible to conclude on nature, necessity or avoid

ability of causality; second, new situations created by the manageable
causalities put aside its objectivity characteristics. However the process

should be generated from objective inception. It is not the natural outcome
of the process; it does not create, in contrast it is created. Third, taking into

consideration that the speed of macro-economic system’s change is quite
high, the economics on macro level is established based on the concept of

“subjective causality – objective result”. The interesting point is that when

we leave the causality-result relations aside, all contradictions are
eliminated and we can witness more precise structure.

The time problem of causality
Economic investigations on identification of causality of the some

particular process are usually directed from present to the past. Such
approach is widely spread and accepted in economic science. It is not

considered as exception or even hypothesis. It is misleading. The main

misleading point is that the specifics of economic time are not

22