Page 12 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 12

Adalat  J. Muradov, Nazim  O. Hajiyev: Competitive environment is the main factor for integration
                                                                                          into the world economy


               sugar syndicate controlling 70% of internal market and 80% of export, paper syndicate controlling

               80% of paper production and etc. could be noticed [Bagdanov A. 1993.p.118].


                       Prodamet syndicate took major role among Russian syndicates. This syndicate controlled 83

               % of iron sort and layer iron,  95 % of log and sveller , 75 % of railway rails and 100% of railway


               shafts production and sales in 1912. Produgol syndicate took second place controlling  all production

               of  Donetsk  coal  field  or    approximately  2/3  part  of  Russian  coal  production.  This    syndicate


               continuously  limited  coal  supply  in  market  and  gained  opportunity  to  increase  prices  sharply  by

               creating an artificial coal shortage. With the same method  sugar syndication (100% of production),


                Roofing syndication (70%  of the  production  of  iron roofing), Copper   syndication   (95%  of

               copper production), "Platinum"  Syndication  (90% of platinum production), tobacco  trust  (70%),


                plug trust  (100%), syndication manufacturing agricultural tools (more than 70%) and "Prodvaqon"

               syndication (97%  of  wagon  production) functioned well.  Syndicate  movement  also  covered

               production  of  matches, bottles,  mirror glass,  brick,  salt, river  transport  and  etc.  [Chyperovich  G.


               1988.p.299].

                       Monopolization  firstly  covered  raw  materials, fuel  and producing lower-level


               manufacturing products  sectors.  Production  conditions  of  these  sort  of  products  were  little

               different in various companies and consumers as a rule not preferred the certain types.


                       On  the  other  hand,  high-level processing areas  could  hardly  monopolized  due  to  the

               extreme variety of products [Shasta I. 1991.p.170]. For example, big electro-technical enterprises


               got agreement on a small number of dams for some special products in this period in Germany.

               As  the  differences  on  the  technologies,  values  of  the  labour  force  and  commercial  methods


               estimated so high and companies were in different situation as a result of monopolization. Failed







                                                             12
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17