Page 53 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 53

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.74, # 2, 2017, pp. 51 - 63



               In  other  words,  increase  in  corruption  causes  decrease  in  income  taxes  of  tax  payers.  On  the
               other  hand,  corruption  exaggerates  the  volume  of  government  spending  and  reduces  the
               productivity  of  effective  government  expenditure.  All  these  negativities  trigger  inflation  and
               lower growth rates (Ghosh and Neanidis, 2010: 25).

               Presence  of  asymmetrical  information  among  bureaucrats/politicians  versus  public  triggers
               corruption  as  well.  Having  specialized  knowledge  not  easily  understood  by  public  brings  out
               power  to  bureaucrats/politicians.  Knowledge  and  power  in  public  sector  increase  corruption
               especially  in  underdeveloped  and  developing  countries.  As  public  corporations  have
               monopolized, certain interest groups become a part of government policies and begin to gain
               power, and all these lead to an increase in bureaucratic/political corruption in the country (Dong
               and  Eom,  2008:  301).  Additionally,  asymmetrical  information  among  bureaucrats/politicians
               affects level of expenditure per person and decrease tax revenues (Mačkić, 2014: 7).
               In this study, we research the effect of corruption, government effectiveness, regulatory quality,
               and rule of law representing the quality of public administration on the total tax revenues in 35
               OECD countries during the periods 2002-2015 by employing panel regression analysis. So the
               study will be one of the early studies investigating the effect of corruption and public governance
               on tax revenues and in turn make a contribution to the relevant literature. In the coming section,
               the  relevant  empirical  literature  will  be  summarized,  then  data  and  econometric  methodology
               will be described in Section 3. Section 4 presents empirical analysis and major findings. Finally,
               the study will be over with Section 5.


               2. Literature Review

               The public sector has become an important determinant of economic growth in the context of
               endogenous  growth  theories.  In  this  regard,  the  researchers  have  focused  on  the  government
               expenditures  and  public  finance  especially  tax  revenues.  So  determinants  of  tax  revenues  has
               gained  importance  and  some  scholars  have  researched  the  interaction  between  corruption,
               governance and tax revenues in the recent years and discovered that both corruption and different
               governance indicators have had significant effect on the tax revenues.

               Ghura (1998) conducted a research on the relationship between corruption and taxes in 39 Sub-
               Saharan African Countries and revealed strong statistical evidence that an increase in the level of
               corruption  lowers  the  tax-revenue/GDP  ratio.  On  the  other  side,  Tanzi  and  Davoodi  (2000)
               observe that corruption in developing countries is at a higher level and corruption has a greater
               impact  on  direct  taxes  in  these  countries.  Also,  corruption  in  developing  countries  displays  a
               coherent  correlation  with  the  high  level  of  tax  evasion  in  these  countries.  In  the  paper,  it  is
               calculated that a 4 point reduction in corruption can increase direct taxes in developing countries,
               as  a  group,  by  7,2  percent  of  GDP.  In  the  study  by  Treisman  (2000)  analyzed  ‘perceived
               corruption’ based on certain indexes. According to the analysis results; countries with Protestant
               traditions,  histories  of  British  rule,  more  developed  economies,  more  democratic  regime  and
               higher imports are less corrupt. On the other hand federal states are more corrupt.



               	                                             53
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58