Page 44 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 44

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.78, # 1, 2021, pp. 40-65



                    The  European  employment  report  is  one  of  the  main  tools  to  support  this
                    macroeconomic  indicator.  The  report  says  that  the  EU  is  experiencing  strong
                    employment growth and this indicator has increased in all EU member States, and
                    overall employment growth has been the strongest since the launch of the Lisbon
                    strategy in 2000. In addition, job creation appears to be continuing apace. This is
                    very positive news, which shows that political efforts in the field of employment are
                    beginning to bear fruit in many member States. At the same time, we must not forget
                    that  the  ambitious  Lisbon  and  Stockholm  employment  goals  continue  to  pose  a
                    serious  challenge  and  leave  no  room  for  complacency.  As  in  previous  years,  this
                    issue of employment in Europe addresses topics that are high on the agenda of the
                    European Union's employment policy, complementing and expanding on the topics
                    covered in previous reports. In particular, it aims to inform the broad political debate
                    on flexible security, which resulted in a message from the Commission on flexible
                    security earlier this year with the aim of reaching agreement on a set of common
                    principles  at  the  European  level  in  the  near  future.  It  also  addresses  the  issue  of
                    work-life  balance  and  is  complemented  with  a  recent  report  from  the  youth
                    Commission, which focuses on youth employment [European Commission, 2007].

                    By examining the relationship between capital account openness and labor share of
                    national income [Jayadev A., 2007], the new financial openness index and the cross-
                    country  labor  share  panel  available  in  the  UN  system  of  National  Accounts  have
                    been modified to show a stable negative correlation between the degree of openness
                    and  labor  share.  Although  this  effect  is  absent  for  low-income  countries,  a  direct
                    negative  relationship  persists  for  all  other  subsamples  and  with  different  control
                    mechanisms.  A  plausible  explanation  is  that  openness  changes  the  terms  of
                    negotiations  between  labor  and  capital.  By  increasing  the  bargaining  power  of
                    capital in relation to labor, increased capital mobility increases the rent accumulated
                    in  capital.  Thus,  the  opening  of  the  capital  account  can  lead  to  a  decrease  in  the
                    share of labor in the firm's income and, consequently, at the General economic level,
                    its share in national production.

                    After the appearance of Modigliani's famous article in 1944, which made one of the
                    most decisive contributions to the `neoclassical synthesis "of Keynesian theory, the
                    prevailing  view  among  economists  was  that  Keynesian  unemployment  could  be
                    explained as a result of the main discrepancy between the supply of money and the
                    level of monetary wages. At first, following Modigliani's approach, a distinction was
                    made between the `base case", where unemployment was assumed to arise from the
                    aforementioned monetary disequilibrium, and the ` special case", where employment
                    was considered a determinable liquidity trap.

                                                           44
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49