Page 68 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 68

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.78, # 1, 2021, pp. 66-85



                    LITERATURE REVIEW
                    THE EXTENSION OF THE UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND
                    USE OF TECHNOLOGY

                    The  rapid  development  of  technology  caused  the  emergence  of  new  technology-
                    related  concepts.  During  this  period,  models  dealing  with  human  and  technology
                    interaction  become  more  popular  (Tarhini,  Arachchilage,  Masa’deh,  &  Abbasi,
                    2015) in the early 1980s. Each of the offered  models (i.e., technology acceptance
                    model, theory of reasoned action, innovation diffusion theory, and others) had its
                    strengths  and  weaknesses.  Mostly  the  models  (eg.  TAM,  TRA,  UTAUT)  were
                    focused  on  the  organizational  circumstances  of  adoption  (Davis,  1989;  Sheppard,
                    Hartwick,  &  Warshaw,  1988;  Venkatesh,  Morris,  Davis,  &  Davis,  2003).
                    Considering that technology sales in the business-to-customer field were increasing
                    rapidly,  there  was  a  big  gap  in  analyzing  the  behavior  of  consumers.  Therefore,
                    Venkatesh et. al. (Venkatesh et al., 2003; Venkatesh, Thong, & Xu, 2012) offered a
                    new model for analyzing behavior towards technological products that was built on
                    the review of the most famous theories regarding technology adoption.

                    The extended version of the model (Venkatesh et al., 2012) that is aimed to focus on
                    consumer  electronics  includes  three  new  variables.  These  variables  are  hedonic
                    motivation, price value, and habit. Moreover, the authors emphasize the influence of
                    age, gender, and experience on the formulation of actual use (Venkatesh et al., 2003,
                    2012).  However,  the  influence  of  moderation  is  rarely  examined,  because  its
                    implementation complicates calculation (Tamilmani, Rana, & Dwivedi, 2017).

                    BRAND AWARENESS AND SYMBOLIC BRAND IMAGE IN SMARTPHONE
                    MARKET


                    Based on the previous studies in this field, the author agrees that attitude towards
                    smartphone’s  brand  might  highly  influence  customers’  choice  (Jamalova  &
                    Constantinovits,  2020). This  was  the main reason for involving marketing-related
                    variables in the model. The studies conducted by other scholars (Filieri et al., 2019;
                    Liang, Lai, Hsu, & Chiu, 2018) also support this notion.


                    Apart  from  brand  awareness,  previous  studies  in  the  field  (Jamalova,  2020;
                    Jamalova  &  Constantinovits,  2020)  also  illustrated  the  importance  of  symbolic
                    brand  image.  This  was  supported  by  the  importance  of  symbolic  benefits  for
                    handsets users (Liang et al., 2018; Sun, Zheng, Su, & Keller, 2017).




                                                           68
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73