Page 10 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 10

THE        JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.79, # 2, 2022, pp. 4-18

                    wars could create sustainability (peace) if the war costs are high and the scores are
                    low.

                    Horner et al. (2015) studied the relation between mediation and peace and designing
                    the mechanism for conflict resolution in international relations. They showed that
                    uninterrupted communication helps conflict reduction since it enables the conflicting
                    parties to disclose themselves.

                    Kimbrough et al. (2017) studied the theories, applications and the conflict of interest
                    and war in  economy. They examined the main  models of conflict and conflict of
                    interest and showed that in recent empirical literature, the results confirm the theory
                    of conflicts with both laboratory and field data.

                    Anderson and Mukherjee (2019) investigated seeking no war, achieving no peace.
                    Their model survey “no war, no peace” situations in a game theoretical framework
                    where two countries are engaged in a standoff over a military sector. They suggested
                    two different pathways. The first is idealistic and based on mutual trust whereas the
                    second is based on deterrence meaning that both countries impose a threat of using
                    armed force against the other country in their respective military doctrines.

                    Salimian and Almasifard (2020) studied the economic grounds of peace using game
                    theory.  Presenting  a  static  game  between  players,  they  modeled  the  behavior  of
                    investors and countries concerning the possible strategies for each player. To this end,
                    they first considered a state where two countries are indifferent. Then, in the second
                    state, two competing countries (enemies) were considered and in the third state, three
                    countries  were  assumed,  one  of  which  was  the  competitor  and  the  other  was  an
                    indifferent country. Concerning the obtained equilibrium in three states, the overall
                    result showed that the investor achieves the best consequence (Nash equilibrium) by
                    constituting  portfolio  and  investing  in  various  markets  and  inside  the  country  by
                    interaction and peace.
                    According to studies in the field of economics and peace mentioned, most studies in
                    the fields of economy and peace have used game theories to achieve equilibrium in a
                    certain field (mostly oil and gas) and have not considered it from the view of peace.
                    Therefore, this paper, theoretically and by presenting a model, deals with this issue on
                    how economy could provide the grounds for international peace and utilize game
                    theory.  The  above  presented  research  about  peace  and  economy  is  not  based  on
                    financial  markets  and  this  research  is  presented  for  the  first  time  about  the  role
                    financial markets on peace using important variables such as risk in local and foreign
                    markets, returns in local and foreign markets, economic power of countries and the
                    degree of hostility between countries by modeling. Therefore, this is the innovation
                    of this research.


                                                           10
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15