Page 82 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 82

STUDYING OF SPECIAL PRACTICAL ISSUES OF ABUSE OF DOMINANCE




                     In  most  jurisdictions  private  conduct  that  is  required  by  regulatory

               intervention or by law is not subject to antitrust remedies; only practices in
               situations in which firms enjoy some freedom of choice are so constrained.

               Conduct by regulated firms outside the market in which they enjoy special or

               exclusive rights is most likely to be subject to antitrust scrutiny. Regulated
               monopolies  have  an  incentive  to  extend  their  dominant  position  through

               exclusionary  practices  into  other  markets  to  gain  unregulated  monopoly
               profits.

                     In Telsystem v. Sip, the Italian national telecommunications company,
               which  has  a  legal  monopoly  over  the  public-switched  network,  refused  to

               lease lines to a smaller company wishing to compete in providing closed user

               groups  services,  which  had  been  liberalized  under  a  European  directive.
               Denial  of  access  caused  losses  and  closed  the  market  to  the  potential

               competitor,  denying  also  a  service  to  consumers.  The  Italian  Antitrust

               Authority  ruled  that  the  unjustified  refusal  was  aimed  at  preserving  a
               dominant  position  in  a  relevant  market  different  from  that  in  which  the

               monopolist  has  exclusive  rights.  The  authority  decided  that  such  behavior
               was an abuse of a dominant position.

                     Another  case  involving  exclusive  rights  granted  to  state-owned
               companies, Sign v. Stet-Sip, concerned access to telephone subscribers’ lists

               by  a  would-be  competitor  in  the  market  for  information  services  to

               subscribers.  In  Italy,  as  in  many  other  countries,  the  national  telecom-
               munications company has exclusive rights over production and distribution

               of subscribers’ lists and holds dominant positions in downstream activities
               that use these lists to sell services to consumers and businesses. The refusal

               to  sell  subscribers’  lists  on  CD-ROM  or  to  provide  access  to  the  on-line
               database to prospective new entrants was considered an abuse of a dominant

               position  by  the  Italian  Antitrust  Authority.  The  authority  observed  that  no



                                                       81
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87