Page 101 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 101
Nazim U. Hajiyev: Assessment stages of cyclical development of monopoly and
competition in terms of the reconstruction of Azerbaijan economy
led to empowering of manufactures. Absence of competition caused smaller
regulations for maintenance of quality.
However such measures had only little effect. It should be noted that wide
spread ideas about the high quality products made by middle age craftsmen is
confronting with historical facts. The monopoly of these craftsmen made great
opportunity to decrease quality of goods, even deceive and falsification without
any punishment. For example, London baker theft dough on the table with secret
hole and help of a man sitting under the table in front of the eyes of customers.
Blacksmiths produced goods with low-quality iron which melt in the fire. Sheets
were tightened and then folded with certain ways to hide defects. Low quality
leather tanned in such way, that eternally it looked like high quality leather [V.
Rauscher, 1999 p. 48]. From the other side, suppression of competition as
M.I.Tuqan Baranovski said, “It caused not availability of very rich craftsmen and
extremely poor craftsmen” [Tugan-Baranovsky M.I., 1994.p. 68].
Description of middle age welfare represents some characteristics of daily
economic life of Soviet society. Such level of similarity creates possible historical
repetition thought on development of monopoly structures forming in economical
environments (economical environments in the middle age cities and soviet
society) which qualitatively different and distant from each other. A question is
rising in this situation: Are there any similarity in development of competition
100

