Page 108 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.70, # 1, 2013, pp. 97-117

matches, bottles, mirror glass, brick, salt, river transport and etc [Tsyperovich G.

1988, p. 299].

Monopolization firstly covered raw materials, fuel and producing lower-

level manufacturing products sectors. Production conditions of these sort of

products were little different in various companies and consumers as a rule not

preferred the certain types.

On the other hand, high-level processing areas could hardly monopolized due

to the extreme variety of products [Shasta I. 1991, p. 170]. For example, big

electro-technical enterprises got agreement on a small number of dams for some

special products in this period in Germany. As the differences on the technologies,

values of the labor force and commercial methods estimated so high and

companies were in different situation as a result of monopolization. Failed attempts

for the creation of monopoly unions in other sectors of German machine

building industry incurred due to this reason as well [Shasta I. 1991, p. 183].

The new wave of combining companies and absorption of one company by

another led to the increasing the monopolization of production. This new wave of

combination and absorption widely spread in USA in 1926-1929. This wave is

varies with an increase importance of vertical integration equal to ongoing

horizontal connection and absorption. This change on character and form of

implementation of centralization capital process objectively reserved with the need

107