Page 12 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 12

A.I.Bayramov:Economic time from methodological point of view: anatomy of conceptual  vision



               from the quantitative point of view there is direct relation between the mentioned movements.

               The higher the speed of the movement the larger is the scale of the affected areas.
                       The “static” and “dynamic” models are not realistic for the economic time model. Although

               both models are derived from the time flow process, they reflect the time flow only from certain

               point of views. The economic time is neither in static not in dynamic conditions. The economic
               time in all its reflections takes of spiral… Thus the attempt for comparison of this “spiral” with the

               static and dynamic forms creates the great gap between the reality and methodology.
                     At the same time there are contradictions in form of substantial → relativist which is not of

               current  interest  and  had  not  actual  power  (from  understanding  point  of  view)  during  any
               historical period. The mentioned above dilemma and speculative discussion have nothing to do

               with the economic time. The economic time is not the “second”. It is the substance created by the

               economic  process  and  its  “flow”,  which  is  directly  related  with  it  by  the  means  of  causality
               relations. There are at least two misleading points in this approach:

                    I.  Economic time is the derivative from the astronomic time… However the interaction of
               these two substances occurred only in their names. It is obvious that the economic time, its stages

               and its flow have nothing to do with the millions of years before the neolith period. I would like to
               ask the researchers in this realm, whether the astronomic and economic time coincide during this

               period???  This  is  obvious  misleading…  There  was  not  simply  the  economic  time  during  this

               period! The economic time is a “created time”. It starts from the economic events and processes…
                   II.  Each economic system has its own economic time! This is one of the most wide spread

               misleading.  The  formation  of  the  economic  system  is  the  movement  which  starts  after  the

               commencement of economic time flow. The economic time starts its flow far before the system
               itself, even when hypothesis and idea about the system is forming:

                     The economic time takes the resources, factors and process flow direction from the first
               and  second  rings  of  movement  of  idea  →  process→  system.  The  time  is  a  feature  which  is

               applicable to the “moving” substance: the economic cycle, economic wave and economic lag can
               have different types of the economic time… the economic system is called “dynamic” based on

               mentioned above movement. In other words, the “moving” is not a system, the system itself is

               moved (cycle, wave and etc.). The type of the system is changing in this direction.
                     The  economic  system  can  be  shown  as  a  reservoir  for  different  types  of  times  with

               different nature, direction and frequency. The deeper mentioned above “differences”, the more


                                                             11
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17