Page 94 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 94
T.A.Ivanovich: State-legal regulation in Russia. How can it be evaluated?
Even a brief overview of the object representations of specialists state legal regulation
gives reason to believe that, as such, it can be considered the diverse relationships and processes,
systems and different levels of functionality, and also management decisions - SLR, which V.L.
Tambovtsev prescribes properties “Economic benefits”.
In the list of tools and mechanisms of action of the subject to the object can legitimately be
called organizational and economic mechanisms (A.A. Zarnadze), management solutions (V.L.
Tambovtsev), the standards and norms of international, national and local levels, the laws and
regulations of the higher authorities and management (D.D. Moskvin), decisions and orders of the
territorial authorities, judicial decisions and to determine the orders and instructions managers and
corporations (V.F. Yakovlev, V.K. Mamutov, V.S.Belyh). In recent years, particularly acute is the
problem of improving the quality of SLR at all levels of government. This is a lot of talk in official
speeches of leaders of the country .There are a lot of different literature of this problem, both foreign
and domestic. Much has already been done in this direction. The European Union, as already noted,
has initiated in Europe in line with the administrative reforms of the Concept of the new government
(New public management). Much is being done in this field in China, India and other countries.
Expert assessments of the business community and legal experts suggest that this sector of
the Russian economy, positive changes are slow and inconsistent. Having taken in 2013, the 42th
place in the ranking of the competitiveness of the economies of 60 countries (in 2012 it was the
48th), Russia continues to lag behind in such parameters as the ratings of the quality of
government regulation, infrastructure and low efficiency of the business. Only one parameter of
the four, the Russian economy has shown a marked improvement from 45th place rose to 34th as
macroeconomic indicators. The main reasons for the improvement of the parameter Swiss
research center IMD considered record rise in employment, lower inflation, improving the
structure of the state budget and the stability of the exchange rate [ Edovina T. 2013 p. 6] .
Low efficiency of the business (53rd place as last year) is due to low productivity, quality
of management, low corporate culture and lack of trained professionals. Negative contribution to
the rating of the Russian Federation was made by a condition of health, protection of information
and low innovation potential infrastructure. On the effectiveness of public administration of the
Russian Federation is still among the outsiders rankings (43rd place) because of the poor quality
of the legal regulation of business and public order, limited institutional environment for
sustainable socio-economic development.
93

