Page 111 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 111

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND  PRACTICE, V.71,  # 1, 2014,  pp. 99-119



                                                 Social and Cultural Considerations


                     Social and cultural considerations  play a major role  in  shaping public  attitudes toward

               Chinese FDI.  Cultural consideration came to particular prominence in November 2012 when

               Chen Weidong, chief energy researcher at the CNOOC Energy Economics Institute, chose a poor


               analogy to describe oil sands development.

                     “It’s the same situation as the leftover single women. … It will be the same for the oil

               sands, they will be outdated just like unmarried single women.”


                     The Globe and Mail called the comment “jarring to Canadian ears”.  Bloggers call it worse

               – Mr. Weidong is now the subject of much online abuse in the blogsphere, with “Chinese oil


               industry asshole” being one such title.  Nevertheless, a twist on Hanlon’s Razor appears required

               for conducting international business.

                     “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by cultural differences.”


                     Such consideration is required because on closer inspection the term “leftover women” is

               commonly espoused by Chinese government ministries.  Leta Hong Fincher comments in the

               New York Times  that  the China’s  state feminist  agency, the All-China  Women’s  Federation,


               defines leftover women  “as unmarried  women  over the age of  27”  and runs regular articles

               stigmatizing educated women who are still single.  While distasteful, cultural relativism must

               carry some weight.


                     As is our objective in this paper, we seek to look deeper into the cultural implications of

               such a controversial statement.  The prima facie assessment of the remark is grim: it appears that

               this is a vaguely misogynistic comment from a representative of a nation that is still rife with


               chauvinism.  Nonetheless, we assert that there are three underlying considerations that ought to

               be considered by sophisticated observers before passing judgment on the statement.




                                                           111
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116