Page 41 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 41
S.A.Najafov: Debt rigidity crisis
presence of nominal rigidity is an important part of macroeconomic theory since it can
explain why markets may not reach equilibrium and face crisis.
Rigidity exists in financial sector too. This is debt rigidity which similarly to
wage and price rigidity makes markets unable to adjust quickly and adequately to
the shocks in economy. Debt rigidity can be expressed in the following way: though
income and asset price of economic agents are flexible and decrease during
recession, their debts don‘t decline. This downward debt rigidity restricts the ability
of debtors to fulfill debt obligations and leads to debt crisis.
Debt rigidity causes a debt crisis not only during recession but during
economic rise too. So during economic rise when companies‘ incomes and asset
prices increase but they liabilities remain, the value of external financing becomes
less than value of internal financing that increases demand for credit. And this credit
boom as it was shown by Austrian school creates the prerequisites for debt crisis.
To make real sector more flexible and able to adjust quickly and adequately to
the shocks, companies‘ liabilities similarly to income and assets price should be
flexible. Liability flexibility can be provided by profit/loss sharing. Profit
participating financing will strengthen stability of banks too as money attracted by
banks are not debt but trust account or money transferred to bank in trust.
Debt rigidity negatively influences lending too. It can be seen in Japan where, on
the one hand the companies, because of the fear that incomes and value of assets in the
future will be insufficient for repayment of debts, reduce demand for credits. On the
other hand banks also because of risks to face insolvency to depositors tighten the
41

