Page 81 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 81

Maddallah Bbasheer Abboud Al-Nwaiqah: Theoretıcal Foundatıons for the Formatıon of Admınıstratıve Decısıons


                    members are offered a list of questions on the problem under consideration; 2) each
                    member of the group answers these questions independently and anonymously; 3)
                    the answers are collected in the center and on their basis an integral document is
                    drawn  up  containing  all  the  proposed  solutions;  4)  each  member  of  the  group
                    receives  a  copy  of  this  document;  5)  familiarization  with  the  proposals  of  other
                    participants can change the opinion about possible solutions to the problem; 6) steps
                    4) and  5)  are  repeated  as  many  times  as  necessary  in  order  to  reach  an  agreed
                    solution [Khalil, Tarek M., (2011)].
                    The considered method, like the method of nominal  group technique,  ensures  the
                    independence of opinions of individual members of the group. However, the time
                    spent  on  developing  solutions  increases  significantly  here,  and  the  number  of
                    proposed alternatives decreases. These shortcomings must, of course, be taken into
                    account when choosing the Delphi method for group development of management
                    decisions. [Jery, H (2013), Khalil, Tarek M., (2011)].

                    Thus, there is a fairly large arsenal of methods for making management decisions.
                    Among them are programmed decisions, organizational decisions, group, individual,
                    and  intuitive  management  decisions.  Each  of  the  above  decision-making  methods
                    has a number of positive and negative factors [Kristen, G, (2011)].

                    WAYS  TO  IMPROVE  THE  QUALITY  AND  EFFICIENCY  OF
                    MANAGEMENT DECISIONS:

                    In the conditions of an unstable external environment, internal contradictions arising
                    in the process of enterprise functioning, the management system needs to respond
                    quickly and continuously adapt to the requirements of the modern world, which is
                    constantly changing. Of particular relevance is the ability of managers to correctly
                    assess problem situations in real time and make high-quality management decisions.
                    The problems of forming and making high-quality managerial decisions in modern
                    conditions urgently require the study of theoretical and methodological aspects of
                    managerial  decisions  from  the  standpoint  of  assessing  their  quality  [Kristen,  G,
                    (2011), Larbi, Annor, (2014)].

                    To achieve this goal, we consider it necessary, first of all, to define the concept of
                    “process quality”. In the dictionary of the Russian language S.I. Ozhegov's category
                    "quality" is characterized as follows: "Quality is the presence of essential properties,
                    attributes, features that distinguish one object or phenomenon from others and give it
                    certainty." The loss of properties and characteristics leads to the disappearance of
                    the object to which they belonged.  In this sense, quality is an objective category,
                    because each object or process is characterized by certain properties. It should be


                                                           81
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86