Page 77 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 77

Maral Jamalova: Socıal Influence and Smartphone Adoptıon in Collectıvıstıc Country:
                                                         Evıdence from Azerbaıjan


                    Moreover, based on the literature review two essential marketing-related variables
                    (i.e., brand awareness and symbolic brand image were included in the study. Also,
                    the influence of the gender of respondents' behavior was tested.

                    In the original model, Social Influence was mentioned as a questionable indicator
                    that is affected by age (higher impact in older age) and gender (Venkatesh et al.,
                    2003, 2012). However, the author has a different opinion regarding social influence.
                    She  assumes  that  apart  from  age,  social  influence  is  also  affected  by  cultural
                    differences.  The impact  of the indicator on the  decision-making process probably
                    will  be  higher  in  collectivistic  societies  as  Azerbaijan  (Hofstede  Insights,  2021).
                    Therefore, this study focuses on the relationships between social influence and other
                    variables.  Based  on  numbers  regarding  effect  size  of  significant  pathways,  the
                    findings of the current work are in line with some of the previous surveys (Ameen &
                    Willis, 2018; Ameen et al., 2018); the gender of smartphone users is an essential
                    element  (Venkatesh  &  Morris,  2000;  Venkatesh  et  al.,  2012)  for  determining
                    relationships between different pathways.

                    It  is  widely  known  that  different  sources  of  information  (attitude  of  peers,
                    advertisements, personal experience) might have influence on attitude and decision
                    of  buyers  (Aaker,  1991;  Keller,  1993).  Considering  a  high  level  of  collectivism
                    (78%)  as  well  as  uncertainty  avoidance  (65%)  the  author  assumed  that  social
                    influence might have an impact on brand awareness. However, considering the age
                    of respondents, it is highly relevant that they receive information from the other (i.e.,
                    above mentioned) sources and those sources have a stronger effect on the decision.
                    Unfortunately, there is a knowledge gap regarding the relationship between social
                    influence  and  marketing-related  variables.  So,  the  results  regarding  the  impact  of
                    surrounding on brand awareness (H1. SI→ BA) cannot be compared with previous
                    studies. Nevertheless, social influence does not have any effect on smartphone brand
                    awareness among none of the genders  (surveyed males and females) in Azerbaijan.
                    It might lead the author to the idea that Azeri young adults are more influenced by
                    advertising than by receiving information from peers.
















                                                           77
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82