Page 56 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 56

STUDYING OF SPECIAL PRACTICAL ISSUES OF ABUSE OF DOMINANCE




               developing countries; moreover it gives recommendations to look into these

               countries regarding their practices for the abuse of a dominant position.


                     Key  words:  abuse  of  a  dominant  position,  dominance  or
               monopolization, competition law, market power.

                     JEL Classification Codes: D41

                     Introduction

                     Abuse of a dominant position, or monopolization, is one of the most
               challenging areas of competition law in both developed and emerging mar-

               kets.  Situations  involving  abuse  of  dominance  may  range  from  predatory
               behavior by firms in isolated local markets for low-technology products (for

               example, industrial waste collection) to high-tech industries in which access

               to a network is restricted for anticompetitive purposes.
                     Abuse of dominance cases may have special importance in transition

               economies.  For  example,  competition  law  provisions  relating  to  abuse  of
               dominance may have an important role to play in addressing anticompetitive

               practices that entrench former state-owned monopoly enterprises. Abuse of

               dominance provisions may also be useful for easing restrictions on access to
               distribution systems in local markets.

                     In cases involving abuse of dominance or monopolization it is essential to
               ensure that application of the law does not inadvertently curb efficient business

               practices.  It  is  important  to  recognize  that  firms  may  achieve  legitimately  a

               dominant  position  in  a  market  (for  example,  through  innovation,  superior
               production  or  distribution  methods,  or  greater  entrepreneurial  efforts).

               Moreover,  many  practices  that  appear  anticompetitive  (such  vertical  market
               restraints  as  tying  or  exclusive  dealing  requirements)  can  serve  legitimate

               procompetitive purposes in some circumstances.






                                                       55
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61