Page 69 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 69
THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE
is abusive requires detailed analysis of the purpose of the tie-in and the
market context.
Sometimes two products are vertically related, with one good an input
in the production of the other. If so, the competition agency must try to
understand the reasons for the tie-in. In general, a tie-in cannot be motivated
by abuse if the two products are used in fixed proportions (as might be the
case in an industrial process): the dominant firm could maximize profits by
charging a sufficiently high price in the tying market, and the tie-in practices
would not increase profits.
Tying is often motivated by the firm's desire to maintain or increase its
reputation for quality or product reliability. This should not be considered
abusive since it increases efficiency and market demand. For example, poor
servicing of a dominant firm's product by an independent company may
negatively influence the reputation of the dominant firm and result in lower
sales. To avoid this the dominant firm might sell its products and services
together through a tie-in contract. Nevertheless, it is worth considering whether
the legitimate aim of the dominant firm to maintain or increase its reputation
could be reached by less restrictive means, such as an improvement of its quality
control processes.
Tying raises concerns for competition policy when it allows
supranormal profits to be made in a properly defined market. This might be
the case when tie-in practices raise entry barriers to competitors and enable
the exercise of market power in the tied market. Tying can also be an abuse
if used to evade price regulation on the tying good. Suppose a dominant firm
has market power in its primary product. Suppose further that the dominant
firm’s price is regulated, which effectively prevents it from earning all of the
monopoly profits that it could if there were no regulation. The dominant firm
would have an incentive to sell its regulated product on condition that
68

