Page 117 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 117
THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.71, # 1, 2014, pp. 99-119
7. The government should bear in mind issues of reciprocity. Convincing the Chinese
government to allow Canadian firms to invest in China can be mutually-beneficial. The
Canadian government must communicate to China the benefits that Canadian companies can
bring to the table in terms of business practices and ethics.
Conclusion
Benjamin Franklin’s quote that “no nation was ever ruined by trade” is relevant to the
discussion of Sino-Canadian FDI. While the stakes are far from ruinous, the issue is
nevertheless contentious. We advocate the mindset of “economic realism” as purported by
Professor Wong that recognizes the geopolitical and economic importance of China and seeks to
adopt slow and steady steps toward a sophisticated and mutually-beneficial trading relationship.
The view advanced by Diane Francis is that shortcomings with FIPA warrant simply abandoning
it. This is reminiscent of idealism, and is not advisable. Ultimately, via strategic political
planning within Canada’s corporate and governmental sectors to both open the door yet insist on
good manners, seeking to dispel unjust perceptions, fighting for solid economic principles and
finally working with Chinese firms to ensure more cultural sensitivity is demonstrated on both
parties’ behalf is crucial. The importance of trade and free-flows of capital cannot be overstated,
and China is a player of significance in both areas. In essence, Chinese FDI is a phenomenon
that may be leveraged to strengthen both countries simultaneously. Chinese FDI deserves an
objective audience as it is not intrinsically bad. Anything less is unfortunately reminiscent of the
zero-sum game economics of mercantilist theories from centuries past.
Literature
[1] http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/china.50/inside.china/profiles/deng.xiaoping/
[2] http://www.economist.com/node/21542931
[3] http://www.economist.com/node/21542931
117

