Page 12 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 12

Adalat  J. Muradov,  Nazim  Ö. Hajiyev: Analytical frameworks and procedures for  application of
                                                       demonopolization


               import barriers are seen as temporary). Where the negative effect of the monopoly is not high


               and imports barriers are in fact are for short-term, demonopolization may be inexpedient. But

               privatization without demonopolization will cause formation of a new strong group that are keen

               on making obstacles for free trade and having common interests.


                    When import barriers and transport expenses are less, foreign suppliers may compete with

               local enterprises.  If  this competition is strong  in  relation  to local  producers or  goods,

               demonopolization  of assets  of local enterprises providing the market with  goods,  will not


               enhance this competition.  Where the import barrier are less, the following products may offer

               good sale,  for instance:  various  grades of  steel,  trucks and  passenger cars,  high power and


               distribution  units,  some chemicals and  a  number  of other  finished products  or  agricultural

               produces [Neven D. 2007]. If the products offered are difficult to sell or there are other barriers

               to a free import, demonopolization is not encouraged. This is because enterprises selling these


               products are very likely to fail competition with foreign producers. For instance, retail trade and

               many professional services usually are not study subjects of the international trade; therefore,

               companies rendering services  to them should not  be removed from demonopolization for


               effectiveness of international competition.

                    3.b. Markets and free entry

                    Demonopolization in markets with relatively free entry may intensify the competition to a


               great extent.  Competition  exercised in such  markets by the existing companies or candidates

               (companies) may  align producers in  dual form thereby squeezing  anti-competitive start:

               enterprises  may  occupy  the market even through weakening  the  leadership of former


               monopolists; or enterprises may  display a real danger  of appearing  in  the market during







                                                           12
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17