Page 62 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 62

THE                      JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.82, # 1, 2025, pp. 52-69

                    The total effect of job insecurity on life satisfaction was found to be significantly negative,
                    suggesting that individuals experiencing higher levels of stress or anxiety about potential
                    unemployment tend to report lower overall satisfaction with their lives. This is consistent with
                    the established understanding that job insecurity acts as a chronic stressor that undermines
                    psychological well-being. Interestingly, the direct effect of job insecurity on life satisfaction,
                    when controlling for the mediators, was positive and statistically significant.

                                    Table 3.1. The second model: Summary of effects
                     Type of Effect         Coefficient        SE           t           p-value

                        Total Effect          -0.6469***      0.0930      -6.95          .0000
                        Direct Effect         -0.1965         0.1148      -1.71          .0875
                        Total Indirect        -0.4505         0.0773       —              —

                                  Table 3.2. The second model: Mediation route analysis
                     Path         Description                       Effect        BootLLCI–ULCI

                        Ind1      JS → GG → LS                      -0.0027       [-0.0489, 0.0387]
                        Ind2      JS → SI → LS                      -0.0916**     [-0.1647, -0.0255]
                        Ind3      JS → FH → LS                      -0.2936**     [-0.4292, -0.1691]
                        Ind4      JS → GG → SI → LS                 -0.0141**     [-0.0286, -0.0035]
                        Ind5      JS → GG → FH → LS                 -0.0137**     [-0.0283, -0.0039]
                        Ind6      JS → SI → FH → LS                 -0.0302**     [-0.0506, -0.0149]
                        Ind7      JS → GG → SI → FH → LS            -0.0046**     [-0.0087, -0.0018]

                                   Table 3.3. The second model: Pathway effects output
                                                                  Standardized
                                      Pathway                                     SE      p-value
                                                                   Coefficient (β)
                     Direct Effects
                        Job Insecurity → Life Satisfaction       –.254***        .038      .000

                     Indirect Effects (Mediators)
                     JobInsecurity → GoalGrowth                  –.155***        .032      .000
                     GoalGrowth → LifeSatisfaction                .129***        .031      .000
                     JobInsecurity → Social Impact                .210***        .028      .000
                     Social Impact → LifeSatisfaction            –.118***        .029      .000
                     JobInsecurity → Future Hope                 –.308***        .034      .000
                     Future Hope → LifeSatisfaction               .228***        .033      .000

                     Model Fit Indices
                     Chi-square (χ²)                             14.721         df = 2     .001
                     Comparative Fit Index (CFI)                   .997
                     Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)                      .983
                     Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)   .032
                     Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR)   .008
                     Note: *p < .001      SE = Standard Error.
                     Fit indices indicate an excellent model fit according to conventional thresholds (CFI & TLI >
                     .95, RMSEA < .05, SRMR < .08).



                                                           62
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67