Page 80 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 80

THE                      JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.82, # 1, 2025, pp. 70-88

                    significant.  This  analysis  demonstrates  that  both  Service  Quality  and  Patient
                    Satisfaction differ significantly according to gender.
                                            Table 3: ANOVA Results by Age
                       Anova
                       Scale                  Age Group         N      Mean (x)      F      P
                                              Under 26                 3.4786
                       Service Quality        27-35                    3.4006
                                              36-44                    3.3333        0.209  0.890
                                              44 and above             3.3462
                                              Total             136    3.4128
                                         Note: p < 0.05, two-tailed test, (N = 136)

                    The ANOVA analysis results presented in Table 3 aim to examine whether there are
                    statistically  significant  differences  in  Service  Quality  across  different  age  groups.
                    According to the findings, no notable differences were observed in the mean Service
                    Quality scores among the age groups (F = 0.209, p = 0.890). These values indicate
                    that there is no statistically significant variation in Service Quality based on age. The
                    mean  scores  are  relatively  similar  across  groups,  and  the  p-value  exceeds  the
                    commonly accepted significance levels of 0.01 and 0.05, leading to the rejection of
                    the hypothesis. Based on the results, age does not have a significant effect on the
                    Service Quality experience.
                                                Table 4: Correlation Analysis
                       Measures        Mean       SD           1         2        3   4        5     6    7

                     Service         3.4128  .82693         1
                     Quality (1)
                     Patient         3.2191  .85855   .824**        1
                     Satisfaction  (2)
                     Tangibles (3)   3.4467  .92166   .853**   .688**         1

                     Reliability  (4)   3.4176  .88626   .933**   .734**  .764**          1

                     Responsiveness (5)   3.4375  .88021   .929**   .777**  .721**   .851**           1
                     Assurance (6)   3.4007  .91403   .943**   .779**  .742**   .833**   .874**     1
                     Empathy (7)     3.3706  .90252   .930**   .800**  .710**   .814**   .833** .886**    1
                                            Source: Compiled by the authors

                     The  results  of  the  correlation  analysis  illustrate  the  relationships  among  Service
                    Quality (SQ), Satisfaction, Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, and
                    Empathy. The analysis provides the means (M) and standard deviations (SD) for each
                    variable, and all correlation coefficients are statistically significant at the 0.01 level.
                    The  Service  Quality  scale  shows  very  strong  positive  correlations  with  the  other




                                                           80
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85