THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE (JESTP)
(Scientific, Refereed, Biannual)
Reviewer’s Assessment Questionnaire
 

Article Title:
1. Is the author’s language clear and smooth?
          1. Excellent       ( )
          2. Good             ( )
          3. Satisfactory   ( )          
          4. Unsatisfactory ( ) 
2. Does the name of the article reflect the content of the text?
          1. Yes        ( )
          2. Partial    ( )
          3. No          ( )  
3. Does abstract of the article reflect the purpose, methodology and results of the study?
          1. Yes      ( )
          2. Partial  ( ) 
          3. No        ( )    
4. Are the aim of the study, its the problem or topic fully covered?
          1. Yes      ( )
          2. Partial  ( )    
          3. No        ( )
5. Are the research methodology and its application mechanism satisfactory?
          1. Yes      ( )
          2. Partial  ( )
          3. No        ( )                     
6. Are the author’s  commentary properly correlated with the results obtained from the database and 
   scientific theories?   
          1. Yes      ( )
          2  Partial  ( )
          3. No        ( )    
7. Are there relation between the topic of the article and resources provided?
          1. Yes         ( )
          2. Partial     ( )         
          3. No           ( ) 
8. How do you evaluate the scientific effect of the currect article on science?
         1. Useful             ( )
         2. Partial useful  ( )
         3. Useless          ( )        
The overall assessment of the article
          1. Excellent     ( )
          2. Good           ( )
          3. Satisfactory ( )
          4. Unsatisfactory ()
Final assessment of research
          1. The article can be published   ()
          2. The article can be published after some editions ()
          3. The article can not be published  ()

   Reviewer’s name, surname
   Signature:
   Date: