Page 31 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 31

N.Akimov., S.Baizakov., A. Oinarov., E.Utembayev: The analysis of the macroeconomic
                                               dynamics and assessment of smart factors’ inputs to the balanced growth rates


                    the economy where the demand for goods and services surpasses the volume of the
                    final product.
                         In this connection, the targeting of prices on goods and services, as one of the
                    methods of the anti-crisis management, becomes a serious bottleneck in the way of
                    defining the real  growth of the economy. As indicated above, this topic has been
                    explained, in greater detail, by Thomas Piketty.
                         The price deflator GDP (indicator of inflation) indeed represents a combined
                    factor, consisting of the component that possesses not only the destructive but also
                    developing power in relation to a market economy. The study of its structure may
                    help in analyzing the differences between the rates of implementation of the science
                    and technology, and finance, and social, and political innovations.
                         The final outcome of such study may be the assessment of the quality of the
                    innovations-based  input  to  the  development  of  national  economy.  Thus,  the
                    assessment of the innovations-based contribution of entrepreneurs is defined by the
                    level of inflation\deflation, production costs. The assessment of the quality of the
                    innovations-driven  contribution  to  finance  is  defined  by  the  level  of
                    depreciation/appreciation of money, national currency (рр). The assessment of the
                    innovations-based input by the corporate management structures, particularly, their
                    decisions making effectiveness, and of public and private partnerships is defined by
                    the quality and the level of the science and technology potential in the country (с).
                         The Table below reflects the indicators on defining the science and technology
                    potential, based on the example of Kazakhstan for the time series 2000-2010.
                         Table: The  Indicators of the Balanced Economic Growth of Kazakhstan for
                    2000-2010. (2000 = 100)


                      Indicators           2000   2001   2002   2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010

                      GDP Deflator in    100   107   108   124   158   191   244   290   358   305  364
                      year 2000, %
                      IFO GFP in 2000, %  100   114   125   136   149   164   181   197   204   206  221
                      The level of the
                      country‘s science
                      and technology     100   98   105   108   105   105   107   111   109   116  127
                      potential, %
                      (rounded up.)
                      The purchasing
                      power of the national
                      currency,          100   92   97    87   67    55    44   38    31     38   35
                      Kazakhstan‘s Tenge,
                      (KZT), в %
                      The Index of real   100   114   125   136   149   164   181   197   204   206  221
                                                           31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36