Page 33 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 33

N.Akimov., S.Baizakov., A. Oinarov., E.Utembayev: The analysis of the macroeconomic
                                                 dynamics and assessment of smart factors’ inputs to the balanced growth rates


                    Kazakhstan  shall  take  place,  to  ensure  coherence  between  measurements  of
                    expenditures and their outcomes.
                         The purchasing power of the national  currency (pp) in  the above Table  has
                    been defined in the percent relative to year 2000, according to the recurrent formula:
                         pp=c/pb,( С )
                         where  с – the level of the science and technology potential of the country, and pb
                    – the level of the GDP deflator (pb).
                         As seen from the above Table, the purchasing power of the Kazakhstan Tenge
                    fell to pp=35% over the last decade compared to its level in the base year 2000. The
                    similar trend showing the decrease of the national currency has also been attributed
                    to other developing countries.
                         The  nominal  GDP  growth  indexes  (NGDP)  have  been  set  by  the  official
                    statistics data and the real GDP growth rates (RGDP) in this Table, by means of the
                    de-filing  have  been  determined  in  the  certain  percent  relative  to  year  2000,
                    according to formula below:
                                                 RGDP=NGDP/pb.            (D)
                         For  the  period  2000-2010,  the  growth  rates  of  the  real  GDP  equaled
                    RGDP=221%. The last two rows of the above Table reflect the balanced levels of
                    the real  final  product  -  RQ. One of those has  been defined  as  the product  of the
                    nominal GDP (NGDP) and the genuine purchasing power of the national currency of
                    the country:
                                                       RQ = рр*NGDP.
                          In this case, the growth rate of the real final product has equaled RQ =281%.
                    The other of the two has been defined as the product of the real GDP and the level of
                    the science and technology potential of the country:
                                                        RQ = с*RGDP.
                         The  above  indicator,  in  the  same  extent  as  the  first  one,  has  equaled  RQ
                    =281% and, has turned out to be by 1/3 larger than that of the real GDP which has
                    been derived from the official statistics. Such result has been obtained by defining
                    the precise assessment of the growth rates of the science and technology potential of
                    the country.
                         Thus, the calculations of the growth rates of the final real product on the basis
                    of the GDP of the official statistics data, with the account of the level of the science
                    and technology potential of the country proves the balanced growth of capital, in its
                    form of money, and capital, in its form goods.
                         Thus,  the  new  model  of  the  balanced  levels  of  production,  employment,
                    income, and prices defines the entire set of the pre-calculated GDPs that have been
                    identified by means of the relevant qualitative indicators.


                                                           33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38