Page 64 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.72, # 2, 2015, pp. 54-72

development, and the last column contains the level of an innovative development
corresponding to the set.
7. Values of the parameters of a situation of management are evaluated, the
set of which (x0, y0...,z0) determines its position in the space of the innovative
development parameters.
There is, in a certain predetermined sense, the nearest to the point (x0, y0...,z0)
reference class, by the level of which an innovative development level is defined.
Implementation of the stage demands setting in the space of innovative development
parameters of the metrics or affinity measures, through which the "nearest" reference
class is defined.
8. In accordance with the results and "configuration" of the parameters‟ values.
Multifactor model of a complex evaluation of the subjects’ innovative
potential based on the theory of fuzzy sets
The above-stated order of adoption of a management decision can be
presented in a form of a block-scheme for a factorial analysis of subjects. We will
divide factors by n criterion.
Elaboration of the system of balanced indicators for evaluation of the level of
an innovative potential and determination of their interrelation within the framework
of such a model was done with the use of the determined factorial analysis, and was
logically predetermined by the essence of the innovative activity of the scientific-
technological complex of the economic zones.
N criterion of factors (groups) (G) is singled out and a scale is developed for
evaluation of every model‟s element, a correlation is done of the indicators‟ values
with the corresponding values of the level of an innovative potential (G - G ij), where
i is a number of criteria i=1,n; j is a number of indicators j=1,m; (Table 2).

Table 2.Factors for evaluation of the Innovative potential component of the
scientific-technological complex of the economic zones
Numbers Groups Indexes Indicators
i
G 1 Educational level 3 G a 1i ,  3 , 1
i
G 2 Standard of well-being 2 G a 2i ,  2 , 1
G 3 Level of infrastructure elements in a region 1 G a 4i ,  1 , 1
i
i
G 4 Level of economic development of a region 2 G a 5i ,  2 , 1

64