Page 65 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

A.D.Huseynova, O.I.Mazanova: Model of a evaluation of an innovative capital of the
subjects on the basis

The opinions found as a result of processing of the expert data were averaged out with the
use of an arithmetic mean. Where G i – is weight of the factor for i- expert, k – is the number
of experts.
k
 G i
G  i1
i
k
The ranged list consisting of four groups has three levels of mutual preferences (Table 3).
Table 3.Ranged number of groups of factors by the method of a direct arrangement
Group number Names of the groups of factors Factor rank in the list
G 1 Educational level 3
G 2 Standard of well-being 2
G 3 Level of infrastructure elements in a region 1
G 4 Level of innovation development of a region 3

Weighting factors of the list ranged by Fishbern rule with the use of a
recursive scale were determined. The condition of priority of the first two groups
over each other and over the third group, and an alternative of indifference of the
second and the third groups is characterized by the following relation:
G 3>G 2>G 1≈G 4
Determination of criteria by Fishbern Scale:
2 (n  i  1)
W  (n  1) n  ,
i
Where Wi – value coefficient of i- indicator; i – number of a criterion; n – number of
criteria, i = 1, 2, …, n. In our case n=4 (Table 3). If the indicators have equal value:
1
W 
i
n
Ranging of the investigated groups of factors is done by weighting coefficients
(Table 4).
Table 4.Weighting coefficients of the ranged groups of factors
Group of factors Weighting coefficients
G 1 0.25(25%)
G 2 0.30 (30%)
G 3 0.20 (20%)
G 4 0.25(25%)
Total: 1.00 (100%)

65