Page 63 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 63

A.D.Huseynova, O.I.Mazanova: Model of a evaluation of an innovative capital  of the
                                                    subjects on the basis

                                                   G 1                        W 1
                  Formalization of the system of         Determination of          Determination of
                  evaluation of innovative         G 2     the weighting      W 2   standards by
                  development G ij i=1,n; j=1,m;            coefficients           indicators and
                  n-number of criteria, m-number   G 3                        W 3   criteria Uk
                  of signs                                                         k- innovative
                                                   G n                        W n   development level





                      Situation evaluation block                  Adoption of a         Evaluation of
                      G ij ->Uk, i=1,n; j=1,m; k=1,3; n-          management           the results of
                      number of criteria, m- number of sings;        decision           management
                      k- level of innovative development



                                          Figure 2. Scheme of adoption of decisions
                                 G ij- indicators; G i- criteria; Uk- security level decision adopted

                         3.  Innovative development indicators 1, 2, 3 together with the families of
                     their values form a multidimensional space. During evaluation of such a category as
                    “innovative development of subjects”, the space of signs has a hierarchal character.
                     Formation  of  a  hierarchy  begins  with  breaking  of  the  system  of  the  innovative
                    development  indicators  into  groups  of  uniform  indexes.  Such  a  group  is  called  a
                    criterion  –  all  the  indicators  are  divided  into  two  classes  –  indicators  and  criteria.
                    Indicators  of  all  the  hierarchal  levels  are  placed  into  corresponding  basic  scales
                    {X,Y,...Z}, which form a base of multidimensional space indexes, each point of which
                     (x0, y0,...,z0) characterizes a certain level of an innovative development of a subject.
                         4.  The  number  of  the  levels  of  an  innovative  development  of  a  subject
                    necessary for an efficient control is determined.
                         5.  The  space  of  the  innovative  development  indicators  is  divided  into
                    reference  classes,  which  in  a  general  case  are  fuzzy.  With  each  of  these  classes
                    certain  levels  of  such  development  are  bound,  for  example,  U1  =  "high",  U2  =
                    "medium" and U3 = "low".
                         6.  A  qualitative  structure  of  the  model  of  innovative  development  levels  is
                    formed,  for  example,  in  the  form  of  a  decision  table.  In  each  line,  in  the  first  n
                    columns of the table there is one of the possible sets of parameters of innovative




                                                           63
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68