Page 62 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.72, # 2, 2015, pp. 54-72

3. Transformation of a family of properties of an object of management into a
system of parameters (indicators and criteria) of the state of an object of
management;
4. Description of the "hierarchy" of the parameters of an object of management;
5. Formation of a system of measures, in which the indicators‟ values and
evaluation criteria concerning the state of an object of management are estimated;
6. Scaling of the systems of measures by introduction of a system of relations;
7. Elaboration of the methods and procedures for formation of the files of the
reference states of an object of management;
8. Ascertainment of metrics and determination of similarity measures in the
space of signs of a state of an object of management, by which the affinity of the
state of an object of management to the reference state will be determined;
9. Working out of the methods and procedures for formation of files of
management decisions;
10. Formalization of comparison of the management decisions with the
reference states of an object of management, i.e. presentation of it in the form of an
operator of a certain type;
11. Formation of a formalized description of the technology for adoption of a
management decision on the basis of evaluation of a state of an object of
management;
12. Repetition of the whole of the chain of procedures, if necessary.
Solving of the above tasks demands carrying out of the following procedures
(Zubov L.G (2012)):
1. Proceeding from the analysis of the aim of management, many signs or
parameters are singled out, by which the level of an innovative development of a
subject is determined.
2. For each of the above signs an indicator is assigned corresponding to it, for

example, with the values: 1 = "high", 2 = "medium", 3 = "low".

62